Leave a Comment:
4 comments
INteresting article. Comparison with MPFL is good. Cant understand why Modified Brostrum has given very good results without ALL reconstruction in Grade 2+ PLC injuries. I have been doing Brostrum for more than 18 years in Indian patients who are used to sit on the ground. Hardly has seen failure or continuous problems. Pivot shift is eliminated also
ReplyThanks Nishith
Steven Claes was debating the all at the recent esska meeting in Barcelona and was asked why this ligament isn’t as visible as the anatomical images indicate it might be and he made a very good comparison with the inferior Gleno humeral ligament of the shoulder. Which of course is a very important structure functionally but not overly obvious as a discrete anatomical structure.
What we can say about the all is
It exists anatomically
It has the function of a ligament restricting movement
It has the histologiacl properties of a ligament
It carries out an import at role in controlling rotation
I take your point that there are many ways to carry out extra articular reconstructions and your method of choice for the PLC is giving you good results.
What I believe is that we mustn’t confuse posterolateral instability with Anterolateral instability.
We wouldn’t suggest an all recon to treat a Plc injury. In this situation of course you need to carry out a Plc recon and in most instances I think a modified Larsen works well. And this can be done through a very minimal invasive approach. For chronic Plc instability which includes Tripple varus then I would advocate a Laprade anatomic recon
The all comes into its own when there is no Plc injury and significant grade 3 Acl deficiency
Hope that makes sense
ReplyThanks Adrian. Great info and insight that is defiantly thought provoking. Through many years of assessing knees and potential ACL injuries I have perhaps only seen a couple with TOP of the anterior lateral corner. I would expect there to be TOP here with an ALL avulsion in addition to a significant pivot shift. Is non tenderness of this injury potentially a reason why it’s not normally picked up or is it down to lack of anatomical knowledge of the ligament and its attachment resulting in “joint line tenderness” being miss interpreted. I will certainly look out for it more in the future.
Thanks again
Phil Harris
Harris Mind & Body
MSK & Sports Injury Physiotherspist
Thanks phil
I think we are constantly learning and improving our knowledge
Actually if you ask most surgeons with experience we have seen a haematoma in the ALL territory very frequently following Acl injury
The bony Segond is unusual and is indicative of an Acl injury but only present in 2% of Acl injured knees.
In the radiological papers on the ALL if the surgeon or radiologist know where to look this structure can be indentified.
Since Steven Claes brought the all to light in 2013 there have been 86 published articles. ! That’s more than anything else.
The need for an extra articular is unquestionable.
Non anatomic all procedures have been routine for many years for knee surgeons. Perhaps not so much in the uk but the French and Central Europeans have made it routine.
Anatomic all makes a lot more sense.
The hope is that we can improve our results in Acl surgery which currently aren’t as good as we would like !!!
Best
Adrian